Privacy & Data Rights

Zero-knowledge verification system. You prove credentials without revealing identity. Data siloed by function, not consolidated. Privacy by architecture, not corporate promises. Surveillance exists but cannot be weaponized.

The Problem We're Solving

Current system failures:

The fundamental flaw: Current systems conflate identity with verification. You must reveal WHO you are to prove WHAT you are.

The Solution: Zero-Knowledge Verification

The Handshake System

Core concept: Prove credentials without revealing identity. Answer yes/no questions without sharing data.

Verification Flow: 1. User → Website: "I want [service]" 2. Website → Device: "Need verification for [requirement]" 3. Device → IVA: "Does my ID meet [requirement]?" 4. IVA → Government Branch: "Check eligibility" 5. Gov Branch → IVA: GREEN (yes) or RED (no) 6. IVA → Website: GREEN or RED 7. Website → User: Access granted or denied

What the website learns: Nothing. Only GREEN (proceed) or RED (denied).

What the website never learns: Your age, name, address, medical history, or any personal data.

Key Components

Your Device:

Identity Verification Authority (IVA):

Government Branches:

Data Silo Architecture

Critical principle: Data separated by function. No cross-contamination. No "god database" that knows everything about everyone.

Healthcare Branch

Federal Top Level:

Local Hospital Level:

Verification examples:

Justice Branch

What it holds:

Cannot be used for: Employment discrimination, credit decisions, housing denials (except where legally required)

Verification examples:

Licensing Branch

What it holds:

Verification examples:

Treasury/Financial Branch

What it holds:

Cannot be used for: Healthcare decisions, employment discrimination, non-financial purposes

Verification examples:

Basic Identity Branch

What it holds:

Verification examples:

The firewall is legal, not just technical:

If law enforcement obtains medical data and uses it for prosecution, the case is void. If employers use justice data for hiring decisions (outside legally permitted background checks), it's illegal discrimination. Data from one branch is inadmissible in another's proceedings.

Why This Works

For Citizens

For Businesses

For Government

Penalties for Violations

Framework note: The following represents proposed baseline penalties subject to legal review and legislative adjustment. Exact penalties, tier thresholds, and aggravating factors would be determined by legal experts.

Civil (Monetary) Penalties

For data theft and misuse:

Paid to: Affected individuals (class action eligible)

Criminal Penalties (Scaled by Severity)

Tier 1: Negligent/Minor

Tier 2: Reckless/Moderate (1-5 years)

Tier 3: Discriminatory/Harmful (5-15 years)

Tier 4: Violent/Coercive (10-25 years)

Aggravating factors (add years to sentence):

Corporate Liability

The principle: Penalties must be severe enough to deter violations while remaining proportional to harm caused. Privacy violations are treated as seriously as theft and fraud – because that's what they are.

Key Principles

For policymakers and implementers:

Implementation Approach

Privacy and data rights specialists determine:

The framework provides direction: zero-knowledge verification, data silos, legal firewalls, meaningful penalties. Experts determine optimal implementation.